This is the last post of this very long blog series. If you made it all the way through, thanks for your time. I hope it was well spent.
Applying the WK to Other GW books
So what did we learn:
1. Know Your Allusion: GW is very well read, and will reference or allude to mythology, legends, literature, the Bible, etc. in his novels. If you can identify the author(s), novel or body of myth he is alluding to, that can be a key to unlock the rest of the story. It helps to know who his favorite writers are, or who he has been reading lately. He talks about them in interviews.
2. Remember the Layer Cake. There is usually more than one narrative or story being told in a GW book, all stacked atop each other. A single character or event may have multiple meanings or embody multiple allusions. If you find yourself disagreeing with someone else’s interpretation, consider the possibility that you are both right.
3. Word play: GW will use partial anagrams, partial rhymes, translations, shared initials, alternative spellings, etc. to conceal his allusions or the identities of characters and place names. Sir Sabel (Ravd’s mentor) was a word play for Elisabeth, John the Baptist’s Mother (Ravd was a version of John the Baptist). All the letters in Sabel can be found in Elisabeth. An example of using initials: Arthur Ormsby’s initials were A and O.
4. Clues: GW will leave clues to his sources by including things that don’t seem to fit in the setting or story. In the WK, GW includes a minor character, Duke Thoas. Thoas is a name from Greek myth, and had no business being in Norse/British Celidon. That was a clue that there were Greek myths hiding in the WK. He used the “crust of bread” phrase to signal to the legend of Cupid and Psyche.
5. Color, Plant, Animal and Saint Symbolism: He uses these, relying on traditional associations.
6. Unreliable Narrator: Able is one, but less so than some other GW protagonists. “The High Heart” was really “The High Hart” (in my view).
7. Try Ebooks: It’s easier to do a close reading when you can search for words and phrases with a reading app.
8. Multiple readings required: The books are so dense that you can’t absorb everything in one reading. At least for me. I missed 95% of the things I have written about in the first few readings.
9. Wikipedia is your friend. Could not have done this without it, and I will be making my first donation.
What Didn’t I Talk About
I agree with Nick Gevers’ statement in the 2004 interview with GW that the WK is sort of a more “open expression” of ideas addressed in other books (particularly the Sun books), and can be used as a key or Rosetta Stone to better interpret earlier works. I view the WK as a culmination of the story told beginning in La Befana and continued through the Sun books. A heresy for some, but the recurring themes, names, plot structures, figures of speech, etc. have satisfied me on this point.
I didn’t spend much time linking the WK to earlier books, particularly the Sun books, as most of these I have only read a few times. In particular, I have said very little about the three volume Book of the Short Sun, which was completed right before the WK. ( Some reviewers compared the WK to A Voyage to Arcturus, but I think there is more Arcturus in the Short Sun than in the WK. The message from Arcturus is rejected in both). Thematic and structural similarities between the Short Sun and the WK include, but are not limited to:
- Blue = Mythgarthr/Celidon. Celidon has a blue flag. Green = Aelfrice. Both are heavily wooded environments.
- The Whorl is the Castle of Skai where the gods live, and which Able/Horn are trying to get to.
- Krait is described as having eyes like “yellow flame” in On Blue’s Waters, like the Aelf. The Aelf and Dragons are like the inhumi, preying on, but needing the humans/neighbors to become something greater.
- Disiri and the Inhumi both become more human after drinking our blood.
- Horn’s promise to help Krait (perhaps an allusion to Krag of Arcturus) echoes Able’s promise to Garsceg. Horn is very concerned with personal honor and promise keeping, like Able.
- In Return to Whorl, Silk/Horn describes hearing a voice that “might have almost been that of the wind in a chimney.” (Chapter 12). Chapter 38 of The Knight is titled, “The Wind in the Chimney.”
What we saw reflected, dimly, in the earlier books, is made plain in the WK.
How good is this book?
The WK is a very dense, ambitious book. I’ve read a lot of bad science fiction and fantasy that are just a series of battles, MacGuffins, or boy meets girls pursuits. GW does use traditional fantasy plot elements in the WK, but he ties them to larger themes he explores here and in other works. I think the WK is also GW’s commentary on the shared elements of much of our mythology and folklore. There is cross-pollination between Egypt, Greece, Rome, the Matter of France, the Norse, the stories of Arthur, etc. There is a whole field of study, comparative mythology, that explores this very idea. I found it a bit uncanny how GW was able to make so many names fit multiple allusions to different myths and folklore. I am much more sympathetic to comparative mythology theories after reading this book.
I think the WK is the best of the post-Sun books, so far. And better than some of the books that preceded it. One advantage it has is that there was enough pages to fully flesh out the characters and themes. His subsequent books were much shorter, but still feature a large cast of characters.
Reviews were certainly mixed. As far as Amazon.com reviews go, it has a lower star rating than most of the Sun books, the Latro books, and a few others. Some of this may be due to the split in publication. The Utgard segment seemed too long on the first reading, and I believe many readers were expecting Able to meet Arnthor earlier. But I hope this review has shown that Utgard is central to the main themes of the book.
Some of the negative reviews are related to Able’s aggressive behavior in The Knight. I think this can be understood, in part, by imagining a boy placed in a man’s body in a “kill or be killed” environment. There is also the Sword Breaker theory. But, to each his own.
It appears not to be as “literary” as earlier works, by which I mean that it does not have a style of writing that we associate with the National Book Award. Others better qualified than I have said that GW has tried to make his style more accessible to readers over the last 15-20 years. That doesn’t bother me, but I respect those who value the style with which an author writes as much or more as their skill as a storyteller. I lean towards storytelling over style.
While Peace and The Fifth Head of Cerberus probably have more “literary” merit, I certainly enjoyed the story of the WK more. Its one of the few, and maybe only, novels he has written that has an umambiguosuly happy ending (Unless he ever writes Soldier of Canaan and cures Latro). I am a sucker for happy endings, and that’s my bias showing.
Despite any justified criticism,the WK is somewhat underappreciated. In my amateur opinion, its a masterpiece of intertextuality. I have a hard time imagining how difficult it was to subtly use so many myths and other works of literature in one novel. There are probably other allusions and themes in there I never explored in any depth, particularly involving Dickens and Elizabethan England. Remember, GW was in his early 70s when he wrote this. I hope my mind is still that sharp when I am that age.
I hope the WK and GW are still read and thought of 50 or 100 years from now. That’s the main reason I put together this series. The Knight was nominated for a Nebula Award for Best Novel in 2005, but did not win. Paladin of Souls swept the Nebula, Hugo and Locus awards that year. I have not read Paladin, and it may very well be the better book.
Awards don’t always go to the best works, and GW would likely say that awards aren’t the final verdict on measuring worth. However, I wonder if award winners are more likely to be read by future generations. They may be more likely to be reissued by publishers, kept in libraries, appear in lists of best novels of the period, etc. So, I hope this series helps keep the WK in circulation among future readers in some form.
Finally, the book does have a strong religious theme, and many people are not a member of any faith. There may be a natural ceiling to their enjoyment or appreciation of the WK. By way of comparison, I enjoyed Iain Banks’ science fiction novels. The recently deceased Mr. Banks was an atheist, and this point of view was reflected in many of his novels. But I accepted it as part of the admission price to reading his books.
Up next, The Sorcerer’s House, which I view as an unofficial sequel or “companion novel” to The Wizard Knight. It may be a while before I start that review. That will probably be the only other GW book I review in any depth on this blog.
Select Bibliography
Other than GW’s bibliography, the Bible, and the stories of Greek and Norse mythology, the texts cited to or that influenced my thinking on these posts include:
One Thousand and One Nights
Beowulf
various Child Ballads about the Robin Hood legend
Alighieri, Dante: Divine Comedy
Anderson, Poul: Three Hearts and Three Lions, The Broken Sword
Andre-Driussi, Michael: The Wizard Knight Companion
Calasso, Robert: The Marriage of Cadmus and Harmony
Dickens, Charles: Great Expectations
Dunsany, Lord (Edward Plunkett): The King of Elfland’s Daughter
Gaiman, Neil: American Gods
Kipling, Rudyard: Puck of Pook’s Hill
Lewis, C.S.: Till We Have Faces
Lindsay, David: A Voyage to Arcturus
Macpherson, James: Ossian
Malory, Sir Thomas: Le Morte D’Arthur
MacDonald, George: Phantastes
Monaghan, Patricia: Encyclopedia of Goddesses and Heroines
Moorcock, Michael: The Eternal Champion, Corum: The Prince in the Scarlet Robe
Scott, Sir Walter: Ivanhoe, The Talisman
Spenser, Edmund: The Faerie Queene
Tennyson, Alfred: Idylls of the King, The Lady of Shallot
White, T.H.: The Once and Future King (being composed of The Sword in the Stone, The Queen of Air and Darkness, The Ill-Made Knight, and The Candle In the Wind)
version 1.0